|Adjusted EBITDA ($m)||658||634||677||670||584||723|
|Operating profit (before exceptional items) ($m)||238||152||264||267||215||355|
|Profit before tax ($m)||43||(24)||92||119||34||208|
|Adjusted diluted EPS||25.6c||18.7c||30.1c||29.7c||18.8c||37.8c|
- Revenue, aligned with the IFRS definition, i.e. on an equity consolidated basis, excluding joint ventures
- Operating profit (pre-exceptional items)
In addition, Adjusted EBITDA (pre-exceptional items, including joint ventures) is presented as an additional non-statutory /‘non-GAAP’ measure of profit. This is presented at the Group and Business Unit level to report underlying financial performance and facilitate comparison with peers.
Adjusted Diluted EPS is also presented, defined as earnings before exceptional items and amortisation relating to acquisitions, net of tax, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period. In contrast to previous reporting, the measure is stated before amortisation arising from acquisitions only and not amortisation relating to other intangibles such as software costs.
|Bank of America Merrill Lynch||Vlad Sergievskiifirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Barclays Capital||Mick Pickupemail@example.com|
|CanAccord Genuity||Alex Brooksfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Credit Suisse||David Farrellemail@example.com|
|Exane BNP Paribas||Nick Konstantankisfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Goldman Sachs||Sahar Islamemail@example.com|
|Jefferies LLC||Mark Wilsonfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|J.P. Morgan Cazenove||James Thompsonemail@example.com|
|Kepler Cheuvreux||Kévin Rogerfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Morgan Stanley||Amy Sergeantemail@example.com|
John Wood Group PLC is followed by the analysts listed above. Please note that any opinions, estimates or forecasts regarding John Wood Group PLC's performance made by these analysts are theirs alone and do not represent opinions, forecasts or predictions of John Wood Group PLC or its management. John Wood Group PLC does not by its reference above or distribution imply its endorsement of or concurrence with such information, conclusions or recommendations.